Hospital Site Suitability Analysis Using QGIS: A GIS-Based Decision Support Workflow
- Fatima
- 12 hours ago
- 3 min read
Introduction
Selecting an appropriate location for healthcare infrastructure is an important task in urban and regional planning. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) provide powerful spatial analysis tools that help planners identify suitable locations based on multiple criteria.
This project demonstrates a Hospital Suitability Analysis workflow developed using QGIS. The objective of the study is to identify potential locations for future hospital development using spatial datasets and weighted overlay analysis.
The workflow combines terrain analysis, accessibility analysis, population distribution, and healthcare coverage assessment to create a GIS-based decision support system.
Objective of the Study
The main objective of this project is to identify suitable locations for hospital establishment based on:
Accessibility to road networks
Population distribution
Terrain suitability
Existing hospital coverage
The analysis helps planners identify areas that are both accessible and underserved.
Study Area
The analysis was conducted for a selected study area in Thane, India. The workflow can also be applied to other districts, cities, or regions with suitable spatial datasets.
Datasets Used
The following datasets were used in this analysis:
Road Network : Accessibility analysis
Population Raster : Demand analysis
DEM (Digital Elevation Model) : Terrain and slope analysis
Existing Hospital Locations : Healthcare coverage analysis
Data Sources
The spatial datasets were collected from publicly available sources:
OpenStreetMap (Roads and Hospitals)
WorldPop (Population Data)
USGS EarthExplorer (DEM Data)
Methodology
The hospital suitability workflow consists of multiple spatial analysis steps.
1. Data Preparation
All datasets were imported into QGIS and clipped to the study area boundary. This ensures that analysis is limited only to the selected region.

2. Slope Generation from DEM
Slope was generated from the DEM using QGIS terrain analysis tools.
Flatter terrain was considered more suitable because steep areas can increase construction difficulty and reduce accessibility.

3. Road Accessibility Analysis
Distance-from-road analysis was performed using the buffer tool in QGIS.
Areas located closer to roads were considered highly suitable due to improved transportation and emergency accessibility.After buffering done the difference tool to find the area outside the buffer zone, and then merged both the data to use the tool Rasterize.

4. Population Analysis
Population raster data was used to identify densely populated regions.
Areas with higher population density were assigned higher suitability values because they represent greater healthcare demand.

5. Existing Hospital Distance Analysis
Distance analysis was also performed for existing hospitals.
This step helps identify underserved areas where healthcare facilities are limited, also after finding the undeserved areas, used Rasterize tool to covert the vector to raster to work on raster calculator for Weighted overlay.

6. Weighted Overlay Analysis
A weighted overlay model was used to combine all suitability criteria.
Different weights were assigned based on the importance of each factor.
Example weighting scheme:
Weight
Roads : 40%
Population : 30%
Slope : 10%
Existing Hospitals : 20%
The weighted overlay generated the final hospital suitability map.

WebGIS Publishing
The final suitability map was published as an interactive WebGIS application using the QGIS2Web plugin.
This allows users and decision makers to: interact with the map, zoom into regions and visualize the suitability zones in the web.

Conclusion:
The final suitability map classified the study area into:
Highly suitable zones, Moderately suitable zones, Less suitable zones, Unsuitable zones
The analysis showed that areas with: good road accessibility, moderate terrain, higher population, and lower existing hospital coverage were identified as the most suitable locations for future hospital development.
.png)



Comments